This prediction was committed to a SHA-256 hash at call time. Anyone can verify the call was not changed after the fact.
Will Oman send warships through the Strait of Hormuz by May 31, 2026? | No | 2026-05-31
7781276b
Verifying…
echo -n "Will Oman send warships through the Strait of Hormuz by May 31, 2026? | No | 2026-05-31" | shasum -a 256 | cut -c1-8Oman's government and Royal Navy of Oman have zero demonstrated incentive or recent pattern (last 90 days) of independent naval deployments through the narrow Strait section amid the current US-Iran tensions; Oman has instead acted as neutral mediator and rescuer of commercial crews. No statements, preparations, or allied pressure (Trump's calls targeted UK/France/Japan/SK, not Oman) exist to drive action in the remaining 10 days. Base rate of Omani warship transits in similar crises is near-zero, confirming the consensus-priced No outcome.
Rules require official Omani government/military confirmation or overwhelming credible reporting of an Omani warship transit through the narrowest section of the Strait (between Iran and Oman) after market open on 2026-05-06. No such confirmation, announcement, or reporting exists as of 2026-05-21; all regional naval activity references US/Indian/Pakistani assets only, with explicit notes that even those avoid the Strait proper. With 10 days remaining and zero signals of Omani action, no plausible rule-based path exists for Yes resolution.
Low total volume of only $4,586 since May 6 (implying ~$2K weekly) on a 98.7% No price fails the meaningful-volume test for consensus holds; this is a stale, unchallenged quote rather than real consensus. Smart-money whales lean No but with tiny stakes ($98 on No vs $3 on Yes) and no aggressive recent flow or price drift to support the edge. Order-book spread implied by 1.7¢/98.7¢ pricing is tight but irrelevant given the thin liquidity and lack of any whale-driven repricing.
+2 more open picks · full 3-judge reasoning · Telegram premium channel.
Subscribe Now