🔒 Hash-sealed before resolution
This prediction was committed to a SHA-256 hash at call time. Anyone can verify the call was not changed after the fact.
US x Iran permanent peace deal by May 26, 2026? | No | 2026-05-26
e7c306b2
Verifying…
Verify it yourself in your terminal
echo -n "US x Iran permanent peace deal by May 26, 2026? | No | 2026-05-26" | shasum -a 256 | cut -c1-8
🧑⚖️ AI judges
Key actors (Trump, Iranian leadership under Khamenei/Araghchi) show no aligned incentive or recent pattern toward a binding permanent deal by May 26; Trump has repeatedly rejected proposals, canceled envoys, and threatened renewed strikes while Iran reviews drafts amid unresolved core issues (nuclear caps, Hormuz, sanctions). Procedurally and behaviorally, converting stalled indirect Pakistan talks into a signed/confirmed permanent agreement in 3 days has zero historical precedent and contradicts the last 30-60 days of rejections, military incidents, and explicit skepticism. Smart-money NO lean aligns with this; base rate of US-Iran permanent peace is effectively zero.
Rules require either a signed written permanent peace agreement or clear public confirmation from BOTH US and Iran governments by 11:59 PM ET May 26; ongoing indirect talks, rejected proposals, canceled envoys, and unresolved issues (enrichment, Hormuz) as of May 22 show zero qualifying event has occurred or can plausibly occur in the remaining window. Primary sources (official statements) and credible reporting confirm no such deal; default-No applies at deadline with no clarity. Smart-money NO lean (0.71) aligns with rules-based outcome.
High-volume ($1.1M) consensus market at 93¢ No with 3 days left; smart-money whales heavily concentrated on No ($103k stake vs $18k on Yes, 0.71 confidence lean) and price action shows Yes drifting lower on recent news of stalled indirect talks. Order book and volume indicate real liquidity/consensus, no opposing flow or sibling-bin contradictions visible. Microstructure fully consistent with analyst's Buy No thesis.
See today's open picks
+2 more open picks · full 3-judge reasoning · Telegram premium channel.
Subscribe Now