🔒 Hash-sealed before resolution
This prediction was committed to a SHA-256 hash at call time. Anyone can verify the call was not changed after the fact.
Will Donald Trump have a diplomatic meeting with Iran by May 31? | No | 2026-05-31
268c413d
Verifying…
Verify it yourself in your terminal
echo -n "Will Donald Trump have a diplomatic meeting with Iran by May 31? | No | 2026-05-31" | shasum -a 256 | cut -c1-8
🧑⚖️ AI judges
Key actors (Trump, Khamenei, Araghchi, IRGC) show zero recent (last 30 days) movement toward a Trump-level in-person summit; indirect Pakistan/Oman channels remain stalled on core issues with no procedural path or incentive for Trump to fly to a deliberate negotiation in the final 11 days. Trump's pattern is maximum-pressure rhetoric and naval posturing, not last-minute personal diplomacy that would require Senate-level buy-in and public acknowledgment. Base rate of any US-Iran leader meeting inside a 3-week window after saber-rattling is near zero; smart-money whales correctly price this as No.
Rules require Trump to be physically present and actively negotiating in an in-person, publicly acknowledged diplomatic meeting with Iranian reps by 11:59 PM ET on May 31; all current channels (Pakistan/Oman-mediated talks, envoy-level consultations) are explicitly indirect and do not qualify. No credible reporting or official statements indicate any such Trump-attended summit is scheduled or imminent in the remaining 11 days. With no plausible qualifying event possible under the literal criteria, the market resolves No.
Market at 98.7% No with $10.9K total volume since Apr 30 open shows real (if modest) liquidity and tight implied spread; 1w price drift of -1.6pp on No is minor mean-reversion, not aggressive selling. Smart-money whales are overwhelmingly on No ($3,961 stake vs $48 on Yes) with 0.98 confidence, led by high-PnL addresses like ArmageddonRewardsBilly — no opposing flow or thin-book red flags. Recent news confirms only mediated/indirect channels with no Trump in-person meeting imminent, so microstructure fully consistent with the Buy-No thesis.
See today's open picks
+2 more open picks · full 3-judge reasoning · Telegram premium channel.
Subscribe Now