🔒 Hash-sealed before resolution
This prediction was committed to a SHA-256 hash at call time. Anyone can verify the call was not changed after the fact.
Congress passes Iran war powers resolution by May 31? | No | 2026-05-31
d639fde1
Verifying…
Verify it yourself in your terminal
echo -n "Congress passes Iran war powers resolution by May 31? | No | 2026-05-31" | shasum -a 256 | cut -c1-8
🧑⚖️ AI judges
Key decision-makers (Speaker Johnson, Senate Majority Leader Thune, House/Senate Armed Services and Foreign Affairs chairs, and Republican leadership) have zero incentive to advance any binding war-powers limit in the final 11 days before Memorial Day recess; their revealed behavior since March has been consistent procedural blockage of Democratic measures. With a ceasefire in place since early May and the administration already claiming the 60-day clock is paused, there is no political or institutional pressure to force identical passage through both chambers. Base rates for rapid bipartisan war-powers legislation under these conditions are near zero, confirming the analyst's No thesis.
The formal rules require identical final passage by both chambers of a bill that explicitly restricts/terminates/requires approval for U.S. military action against Iran or proxies; all recent Democratic-led measures (H.Con.Res.75, H.Con.Res.38, S.J.Res. variants) have failed on procedural or party-line votes through May 19 with no identical text advancing. The May 31 11:59 PM ET deadline, combined with the Memorial Day recess and absence of any qualifying measure on the floor, leaves no path for the required identical bicameral passage. Official congressional records and credible reporting will therefore show no qualifying event, triggering default resolution to No.
Volume is only $4,622 total since April 27 (implying <<$5K weekly), far below the threshold for a real consensus at 93¢ No; price action shows Yes rising +7.1pp over the past week on whatever flow exists, drifting away from the No thesis. Smart-money whales lean Yes (even at low 0.55 confidence) with no opposing high-confidence flow to override, and the thin book plus stale low-volume price make the claimed 15% edge illusory rather than arb-resistant.
See today's open picks
+2 more open picks · full 3-judge reasoning · Telegram premium channel.
Subscribe Now