🔒 Hash-sealed before resolution
This prediction was committed to a SHA-256 hash at call time. Anyone can verify the call was not changed after the fact.
Trump re-sues WSJ by April 27? | No | 2026-04-27
ea5e15f3
Verifying…
Verify it yourself in your terminal
echo -n "Trump re-sues WSJ by April 27? | No | 2026-04-27" | shasum -a 256 | cut -c1-8
🧑⚖️ AI judges
The market deadline of April 27, 2026, 11:59 PM ET has passed, and the official court docket confirms no amended complaint or new lawsuit was filed by Donald Trump against WSJ by that date; instead, only a motion for extension and discovery was filed on April 14, which does not qualify as it does not assert new or amended claims per the rules. No credible reporting indicates otherwise. Smart money whales on Yes are incorrect, as they likely misinterpret the motion as a qualifying action, but the rules explicitly exclude such motions, and the crowd correctly prices No at 97% with verifiable evidence supporting resolution to No.
The market deadline of April 27, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, has passed, and the official court docket for Trump v. Murdoch (1:25-cv-23232, S.D. Fla.) shows no amended complaint or new lawsuit filed against WSJ by that date; the original complaint was dismissed on April 13 with a stayed deadline, but no qualifying action occurred. No credible reporting confirms any filing, so the market resolves 'No' per rules prioritizing court records. Smart money on Yes (3 whales) was incorrect, likely betting on an expected but unrealized refiling; the 3% edge on No is near-certain given the facts.
Official court docket (1:25-cv-23232, S.D. Fla.) confirms the original complaint was dismissed on April 13, 2026, with an order to file an amended complaint by April 27; Trump filed a motion for extension on April 14, and the court stayed the deadline on April 23 pending response, but no amended complaint or new lawsuit was filed by April 27, 11:59 PM ET. No credible reporting indicates otherwise, so the market resolves No per rules requiring actual filing of amended complaint or novel lawsuit. Smart money on Yes (3 whales) is incorrect, as they overlook the lack of docket entry for a qualifying filing; low volume suggests limited conviction.
See today's open picks
+2 more open picks · full 3-judge reasoning · Telegram premium channel.
Subscribe Now