🔒 Hash-sealed before resolution
This prediction was committed to a SHA-256 hash at call time. Anyone can verify the call was not changed after the fact.
Israel military action on Damascus by April 30, 2026? | No | 2026-04-30
ee2d6f8a
Verifying…
Verify it yourself in your terminal
echo -n "Israel military action on Damascus by April 30, 2026? | No | 2026-04-30" | shasum -a 256 | cut -c1-8
🧑⚖️ AI judges
Web searches confirm no qualifying Israeli strikes (impacting drones/missiles/bombs launched by Israel) on Damascus Governorate since market open on 2026-03-31; all reported explosions (e.g., Reuters March 31) are from interceptions of Iranian missiles or unrelated events, explicitly excluded by rules. With only 2 days left and no credible reports or video evidence of a qualifying event, the market will resolve No per consensus of credible reporting and strict definitions. Smart money on Yes consists of small positions (e.g., 60 shares) by lower-ranked whales on a low-volume market, likely speculators hoping for last-minute escalation without evidence, overridden by verifiable facts and 95% crowd consensus.
Web searches confirm no qualifying Israeli drone, missile, or airstrikes impacting Damascus Governorate since market open on 2026-03-31; all reported explosions (e.g., Reuters March 31, Times of Israel April 7) are from Israel intercepting Iranian missiles, explicitly excluded by rules even if debris causes damage. Consensus of credible reporting supports No resolution. Smart money Yes (3 small whales, top 60 shares) is negligible in $6k volume market and likely speculative bets on last-minute action without supporting evidence; crowd at 95% No is correctly riding verifiable facts with 2 days left.
Web searches across Reuters, Times of Israel, and X confirm no qualifying Israeli strikes (impacting drones/missiles/bombs) on Damascus Governorate since market open on 2026-03-31; all reported explosions are interceptions of Iranian missiles or strikes outside the area (e.g., Lebanon roads). With 2 days left and consensus credible reporting showing no events, the market will resolve No per strict rules excluding interceptions/debris. Smart money Yes bets are small (e.g., 60 shares) in low-volume market, likely tail-risk speculation without evidence of imminent strike, not contradicting high-certainty No.
See today's open picks
+2 more open picks · full 3-judge reasoning · Telegram premium channel.
Subscribe Now