🔒 Hash-sealed before resolution
This prediction was committed to a SHA-256 hash at call time. Anyone can verify the call was not changed after the fact.
Will Claude go down 12+ times in May? | No | 2026-06-07
8dafe673
Verifying…
Verify it yourself in your terminal
echo -n "Will Claude go down 12+ times in May? | No | 2026-06-07" | shasum -a 256 | cut -c1-8
🧑⚖️ AI judges
Non-behavioral technical uptime market with no human gatekeepers or decision-makers to analyze. Enrichment and status data confirm ~9 affected days through May 27 with only short incidents; 4 days remain and base rates show Anthropic incidents are brief capacity issues, not full-day non-green boxes. 12+ requires near-total failure in remaining window (probability <<5%), so No at 95¢ meets certainty bar with no behavioral red flags.
Rules require 12+ days with non-green status box on the specific claude.ai component of https://status.claude.com/uptime/ only; other Claude components are explicitly excluded. With 4 days left in May and zero evidence of claude.ai downtime to date, reaching the threshold is impossible. This is the consensus side (No at 95¢) with no rule-based flip possible; ladder structure and smart-money lean both reinforce the outcome.
Smart money strongly aligned on NO ($174 vs $8 stake, 0.89 confidence) with no opposing whales; Yes price has crashed 58.5pp over the month on the 12+ bin while sibling 9-11 holds at 89%, confirming flow against the low-probability tail. Weekly volume $7k is modest but sufficient for this niche event with no thin-book signals or stale pricing. Near month-end (May 27) and consistent downward drift on Yes make the 95¢ No a clean consensus hold with no microstructure red flags.
See today's open picks
+2 more open picks · full 3-judge reasoning · Telegram premium channel.
Subscribe Now