This prediction was committed to a SHA-256 hash at call time. Anyone can verify the call was not changed after the fact.
Military action against Iran ends by April 30, 2026? | Yes | 2026-04-30
582abea2
Verifying…
echo -n "Military action against Iran ends by April 30, 2026? | Yes | 2026-04-30" | shasum -a 256 | cut -c1-8The AI analyst accurately highlights the misleading title, as the market resolves 'Yes' if there is at least one full calendar day without a qualifying US/Israeli strike on Iranian soil by April 30, not permanent cessation. Web searches confirm an ongoing intense conflict with frequent strikes (day 39), but no evidence of strikes every single calendar day without gaps, and logistics make continuous daily strikes improbable for another 22+ days, supporting a true 'Yes' probability >>93% current price for meaningful edge. Market is still open and trading actively, making the trade actionable now with low risk of 'No' requiring confirmed strikes every day until deadline.
The market trading ended on 2026-03-31, prior to the current date of 2026-04-08, making the recommended trade not actionable right now as no positions can be entered. Web searches confirm an ongoing US-Israel air campaign against Iran with frequent strikes reported daily through early April, but no explicit confirmation of strikes on every single calendar day since market open; however, the staleness of the market data and closure negate any current edge. The analyst's interpretation of the rules is correct (Yes if at least one pause), but the opportunity has passed.
The analyst correctly identifies a massive discrepancy between the market title and the literal resolution rules. The rules state the market resolves 'Yes' if there is a SINGLE full calendar day without a strike by the listed date. However, the analyst's timing is slightly off as today is April 8, and the market ends April 30, meaning there are 22 days left for a single 24-hour gap to occur.
Correction: {'trade': 'Buy Yes at $0.90', 'category': 'misleading', 'reasoning': "The market title implies a permanent end to hostilities, but the rules only require one 'clean' calendar day (GMT+3:30) to trigger a 'Yes' resolution. In modern aerial warfare, maintaining a strike every single 24-hour period for 22 consecutive days is logistically and politically difficult, making 'Yes' the overwhelming statistical favorite regardless of the war's overall status.", 'risk': "The primary risk is a high-intensity 'maximum pressure' campaign where Israel or the US conducts at least one confirmed drone or missile strike every single day until April 30 without exception."}
+2 more open picks · full 3-judge reasoning · Telegram premium channel.
Subscribe Now