🔒 Hash-sealed before resolution
This prediction was committed to a SHA-256 hash at call time. Anyone can verify the call was not changed after the fact.
AWS service disrupted by April 30? | No | 2026-04-30
16be9cee
Verifying…
Verify it yourself in your terminal
echo -n "AWS service disrupted by April 30? | No | 2026-04-30" | shasum -a 256 | cut -c1-8
🧑⚖️ AI judges
The analyst fabricates non-existent 'Disrupted' events on April 25/27/2026; web verification confirms only March 2026 events in Bahrain (me-south-1) and UAE (me-central-1), predating market open on 2026-03-24, which do not qualify under resolution criteria covering events between start and end dates. No qualifying 'Disrupted' events listed on AWS Health Dashboard since open, and market remains unresolved despite ongoing listings, indicating those pre-open events won't trigger Yes. Smart money leaning Yes (0.70) likely errs by assuming March events count, but they don't, as evidenced by lack of resolution.
Correction: {'trade': 'Buy No at $0.96', 'category': 'mispricing', 'reasoning': 'True P(No) ≈99% given no qualifying events to date, one day left, and AWS stability; consensus at 96% supported by dashboard verification. Edge ~3% but near-certain outcome over short term yields high return with minimal variance. Opposite of analyst but captures the actual mispricing on No.', 'risk': "Unexpected new 'Disrupted' event today/tomorrow before deadline, though highly improbable based on recent history."}
The AI analyst's claim of 'Disrupted' events on April 25 and 27, 2026, in me-central-1 Bahrain is false; the AWS Health Dashboard shows no such events, only March 2026 incidents (starting March 1, classified March 3) predating the market open on March 24, which do not qualify per resolution rules and guidelines. No qualifying 'Disrupted' events have occurred since market open, so the market will resolve No. Smart money leaning Yes (0.70 confidence) likely misinterprets pre-open March events as qualifying, but whales are not overriding verifiable dashboard data.
Correction: {'trade': 'Buy No at $0.96', 'category': 'mispricing', 'reasoning': "Buy Yes has zero edge as no qualifying event exists; dashboard and web searches confirm clean status post-March 24 with no April disruptions. Consensus No at 96% is undervalued (true P(No) ≥97-99% given 1 day left, no ongoing issues, rarity of 'Disrupted' severity), yielding positive edge with near-zero variance as a high-certainty hold. Edge ~3-4% over 1 day equates to massive annualized return, meeting thresholds.", 'risk': "A new service interruption classified 'Disrupted' could occur and be published by April 30 11:59 PM ET, though highly unlikely absent current indicators."}
The AWS Health Dashboard confirms ongoing 'Disrupted' severity events in the Middle East (Bahrain me-south-1 and UAE me-central-1) regions since March 1, 2026, affecting services like DynamoDB and EC2, which are publicly visible and qualify per the rules. Although the analyst cited incorrect dates (April 25/27, no such events found), the existing events satisfy criteria as they are ongoing within the market timeframe (opened March 24), and a prior identical market ('by March 31') resolved Yes. With the deadline tomorrow and no evidence of severity revision, the market will resolve Yes, validating the Yes trade at 6¢ with high edge. Smart money also leans Yes.
See today's open picks
+2 more open picks · full 3-judge reasoning · Telegram premium channel.
Subscribe Now