This prediction was committed to a SHA-256 hash at call time. Anyone can verify the call was not changed after the fact.
Will Meta have the #3 AI model at the end of April 2026 (Style Control On)? | No | 2026-04-30
fe35e68a
Verifying…
echo -n "Will Meta have the #3 AI model at the end of April 2026 (Style Control On)? | No | 2026-04-30" | shasum -a 256 | cut -c1-8The AI analyst's analysis is inaccurate as it only considers Llama models, ignoring Meta's muse-spark model currently ranked #5 on the relevant leaderboard (Text Arena Overall, Style Control On) with a preliminary score of 1496, just behind #3 at 1498. This proximity and recent release (April 9, 2026) make it plausible for Meta to reach #3 in the next 12 days, undermining the claimed low risk and 10% edge on buying No at 87¢. The true probability of No is likely around 80-85%, not 97% implied, failing the near-certain threshold given the volatility of preliminary rankings.
The web search confirms the analyst's finding. The current leaderboard ([lmarena.ai](https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard/text)) shows Meta's highest-ranked model (Meta · Llama 4) at rank 167 with a score of 1327, far outside the top 3, which are dominated by Anthropic and Google models. With only 12 days until resolution on April 30, 2026, it is extremely unlikely Meta will release a model that leapfrogs into the top 3. The 'No' side priced at 87% still offers a solid edge against a near-certain outcome.
Current Chatbot Arena data ([arena.ai](https://arena.ai/leaderboard/text), Apr 17, 2026) places Meta's highest-ranked model at #5, with the top 3 spots firmly occupied by Anthropic models. With only 12 days until the April 30 resolution deadline, it is highly improbable that Meta will release a new model or see existing scores surge enough to claim #3. Buying 'No' at 87% is a low-risk trade that comfortably exceeds the 80% probability threshold and offers strong short-term returns.
+2 more open picks · full 3-judge reasoning · Telegram premium channel.
Subscribe Now