🔒 Hash-sealed before resolution
This prediction was committed to a SHA-256 hash at call time. Anyone can verify the call was not changed after the fact.
Will Israel take military action in Gaza on March 29, 2026? | Yes | 2026-04-03
c6a23410
Verifying…
Verify it yourself in your terminal
echo -n "Will Israel take military action in Gaza on March 29, 2026? | Yes | 2026-04-03" | shasum -a 256 | cut -c1-8
🧑⚖️ AI judges
The AI analyst's recommendation to buy No is incorrect because multiple credible sources including Reuters and AP News report Israeli airstrikes on Gaza police checkpoints in Khan Younis on March 29, 2026, killing several Palestinians, which meets the market's criteria for a qualifying aerial strike impacting Gaza territory. This establishes a consensus of credible reporting sufficient for Yes resolution.
Correction: {'trade': 'Buy Yes at $0.94', 'reasoning': 'The reported airstrikes qualify under the rules (aerial strikes by Israeli forces impacting Gaza ground, confirmed by major media consensus on the exact date), making Yes resolution near-certain by the April 3 confirmation deadline. With Yes priced at 94¢, this offers a ~6% edge (>20% annualized given short timeline to resolution) on a high-probability (>95% true prob) outcome.', 'risk': 'Resolution could go No if consensus fades, strikes are reclassified as non-qualifying (e.g., intercepted or non-aerial), or date attribution disputed before April 3.'}
The AI analyst's recommendation to Buy No is incorrect because multiple credible news sources, including Reuters, report Israeli airstrikes on Gaza police checkpoints in Khan Younis and al-Mawasi on March 29, 2026, killing several Palestinians. These airstrikes qualify precisely under the market rules as aerial strikes impacting Gaza territory, with consensus evidence already established today, ensuring Yes resolution by the April 3 deadline.
Correction: {'trade': 'Buy Yes at $0.94', 'reasoning': "Reuters and other major outlets confirm the airstrikes occurred on the specified date in Gaza, meeting definitions (aerial bombs/missiles impacting ground), attribution to Israel, and evidence standard (consensus of credible reporting). True probability of Yes is near 100%, providing a positive edge over the 94% price despite the crowd's high pricing, with resolution imminent.", 'risk': 'Minimal; potential oracle nitpicking on exact timing in IST, impact confirmation, or if strikes deemed non-qualifying (unlikely given reports), but consensus is strong.'}
The analyst claims the event is 'near-certain to not happen,' but real-time market data from March 29, 2026, shows the 'Yes' price has surged to 90-94% with significant volume, indicating a strike has likely already occurred or is confirmed by traders. Betting 'No' against a 94% consensus in a high-volume military strike market without specific evidence of a ceasefire or error is extremely high-risk and likely incorrect.
See today's open picks
+2 more open picks · full 3-judge reasoning · Telegram premium channel.
Subscribe Now