🔒 Hash-sealed before resolution
This prediction was committed to a SHA-256 hash at call time. Anyone can verify the call was not changed after the fact.
Will Iran conduct a military action against Israel on March 24, 2026? | Yes | 2026-03-31
42e6dfd1
Verifying…
Verify it yourself in your terminal
echo -n "Will Iran conduct a military action against Israel on March 24, 2026? | Yes | 2026-03-31" | shasum -a 256 | cut -c1-8
🧑⚖️ AI judges
The AI analyst incorrectly assesses the Yes share as overpriced at 88%, claiming low probability of conflict, but this ignores the actual events on March 24, 2026, where Iranian ballistic missiles struck Israeli soil. The market rules are met with confirmed impacts, not interceptions.
Correction: {'trade': 'Buy Yes at $0.88', 'reasoning': 'Credible reports from Times of Israel and Jerusalem Post confirm Iranian ballistic missiles and cluster munitions impacted Israeli territory (Arad residential buildings with 115 wounded, Nesher home, northern open area) on March 24, 2026 Israel time. IDF identifies as Iranian launches, providing official confirmation; consensus media reporting satisfies criteria even without direct Iranian claim. Event post-market open (March 17), qualifies fully.', 'risk': 'If final review attributes strikes to proxies (unlikely given ballistic range and IDF labeling) or lacks origin confirmation from Iranian territory by March 27 deadline, resolves No despite impacts.'}
The AI analyst's finding is wrong because it claims low probability of conflict with no indicators, but on March 24, 2026, Iranian ballistic missiles have already impacted Israeli territory, as reported by Times of Israel and confirmed by IRGC claims. Yes is not overpriced at 88%; it's underpriced given the near-certain qualifying event.
Correction: {'trade': 'Buy Yes at $0.88', 'reasoning': 'Credible reports confirm Iranian ballistic missiles launched by IRGC impacted Israeli ground on March 24, 2026: cluster munition hit a home in Nesher (Haifa suburb), another in open northern area, with blasts and damage in central Israel including Jerusalem. IRGC explicitly claimed strikes on Dimona and Eilat. Meets all criteria—no proxies, direct impacts (not mere interceptions), consensus evidence, within date. True prob ~100%, strong edge.', 'risk': "Oracle might strictly interpret rules to exclude cluster submunitions as 'intercepted debris' or require more definitive non-intercepted impact confirmation, defaulting to No if ambiguous by March 27."}
The AI analysis claims there is a 'low probability of conflict' and suggests an edge on 'No', but current market data and news reports indicate a major ongoing conflict. Multiple sources, including Polymarket Intel and the market prices themselves (trading at 81-88% Yes), confirm that Iran has been conducting a series of direct missile strikes on Israel throughout March 2026, with a 'Yes' resolution already confirmed for March 10. Betting 'No' against a 88% 'Yes' price when there is a confirmed pattern of daily strikes and high-volume consensus is extremely high risk and likely incorrect.
See today's open picks
+2 more open picks · full 3-judge reasoning · Telegram premium channel.
Subscribe Now