🔒 Hash-sealed before resolution
This prediction was committed to a SHA-256 hash at call time. Anyone can verify the call was not changed after the fact.
US x Iran ceasefire before Trump visits China? | No | 2026-06-30
ccdcac88
Verifying…
Verify it yourself in your terminal
echo -n "US x Iran ceasefire before Trump visits China? | No | 2026-06-30" | shasum -a 256 | cut -c1-8
🧑⚖️ AI judges
Web searches confirm no ceasefire agreement has been reached; Iran rejected the US proposal, and military actions continue. Trump's China visit is scheduled for May 14-15 per White House and multiple credible outlets, but it was already delayed once due to the Iran war and remains uncertain if hostilities persist without resolution. Both events remain highly uncertain with the visit conditional on de-escalation, supporting the 50-50 trap analysis and a profitable edge on No shares at $0.46 given the likely neither scenario by June 30.
The AI analysis incorrectly portrays both events as highly uncertain, but official White House announcements confirm Trump's visit to China is scheduled for May 14-15, 2026, making it likely to occur before the deadline and favoring a 'No' resolution if no prior ceasefire. Iran rejected the US ceasefire proposal on March 25 amid ongoing hostilities, lowering short-term ceasefire odds, but diplomatic momentum and market pricing at 55% Yes indicate P(Yes) around 30-50%, not low enough for an 80%+ probability of profitable No outcome (payout >=$0.50). The 50-50 trap premise is invalidated by the firm visit schedule, rendering the edge estimate implausible under current facts.
Current reporting from [reuters.com](https://reut.rs/4lOfMfQ) and [bbc.com](https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c05dpr1m71go) confirms that President Trump has rescheduled his visit to China for May 14-15, 2026. While the White House estimates combat operations in Iran may last another 4-6 weeks, the requirement for an 'official ceasefire agreement' with 'clear public confirmation from both governments' is a very high bar that historically is rarely met in such conflicts before the market deadline. Since the market resolves 50-50 if neither event occurs by June 30, buying 'No' at $0.46 provides a mathematically sound edge toward the $0.50 floor, as the probability of a formal, mutually signed ceasefire before mid-May is significantly lower than the current price implies.
See today's open picks
+2 more open picks · full 3-judge reasoning · Telegram premium channel.
Subscribe Now