This prediction was committed to a SHA-256 hash at call time. Anyone can verify the call was not changed after the fact.
Kevin Warsh Fed Chair nomination withdrawn by May 15? | No | 2026-05-15
b7c6920a
Verifying…
echo -n "Kevin Warsh Fed Chair nomination withdrawn by May 15? | No | 2026-05-15" | shasum -a 256 | cut -c1-8The AI analysis claims low risk of withdrawal because the nomination is official and process underway, but recent credible reports (e.g., Sen. Thom Tillis blocking advancement until Powell investigation resolved) indicate the nomination is stalled in committee with no hearings scheduled, raising the probability of formal withdrawal by May 15 above the market's 3% implication for Yes. Buying No at 97¢ offers negligible edge (max ~3%) with poor risk-reward given heightened uncertainty, and the claimed 40% edge is implausible. No alternative trade meets the >=80% true probability threshold for near-certain profit.
Web searches confirm Trump formally nominated Kevin Warsh for Fed Chair on March 4, 2026, with the nomination received by the Senate (PN855-1) and still pending as of March 28, with no evidence of formal withdrawal; Senate activity like Warren's recent questions shows process ongoing despite delays from Powell probe and blocks. Per rules, formal admin withdrawal required for Yes, unlikely given Trump's backing, and pending/rejection resolves No, making true prob No >98% vs market 97%. Small edge (~3%) over ~1.5 months yields ~23% annualized, meeting threshold for high-confidence single bet.
The market is currently priced at 97% for 'No', which is consistent with the high bar for a formal withdrawal. Search results confirm that President Trump formally submitted Kevin Warsh's nomination to the Senate on March 4, 2026, and despite a procedural blockade by Senator Thom Tillis and a DOJ investigation into Jerome Powell, there is no evidence or political signal that the administration intends to withdraw the nomination. Under the formal rules, even if the nomination is stalled or rejected by the Senate, the market resolves 'No'; only a formal withdrawal by the President or the nominee himself triggers a 'Yes', making the 3% 'Yes' price a clear mispricing of a near-certain 'No' outcome.
+2 more open picks · full 3-judge reasoning · Telegram premium channel.
Subscribe Now