🔒 Hash selado antes da resolução
Esta previsão foi comprometida com um hash SHA-256 no momento da chamada. Qualquer pessoa pode verificar que a chamada não foi alterada depois.
Will Trump speak to Vladimir Putin in May? | No | 2026-05-31
b2cbf83f
Verificando…
Verifique você mesmo no terminal
echo -n "Will Trump speak to Vladimir Putin in May? | No | 2026-05-31" | shasum -a 256 | cut -c1-8
🧑⚖️ Juízes IA
Low-friction event (single phone/video call suffices; one statement or media report resolves Yes). Consensus No priced at 87%+ with 3 days left triggers default reject per rules—no visible catalyst is irrelevant because any actor can trigger it instantly. No recent (30-90 day) behavior or incentives from Trump/Putin indicate a rushed May call; schedule focuses on other leaders with zero leaks or scheduling signals for Putin.
Market requires a qualifying verbal interaction (phone/video/in-person) strictly between May 1-31 2026 ET, confirmed by consensus credible media reporting (or unambiguous official statements not contradicted within 3 days). No such interaction has occurred or is scheduled/rumored in the final 3 days of May per all reporting; the only recent call was April 29 (pre-market). Strict timing + confirmation deadline + absence of any May event means unambiguous path to No resolution by June 3 at latest.
Price action shows Yes drifting sharply lower (-5pp 1d, -16pp 1w) on $41k volume with no recent news of a May call (only April calls reported), consistent with No at 87¢. Smart-money whales are split with tiny stakes and low 0.16 confidence leaning Yes, insufficient to override the clean microstructure and consensus hold. Thin remaining window and lack of flow against No support the thesis.
Veja as apostas abertas de hoje
+2 apostas abertas · raciocínio completo dos 3 juízes · canal premium no Telegram.
Assinar Agora