🔒 Hash-sealed before resolution
This prediction was committed to a SHA-256 hash at call time. Anyone can verify the call was not changed after the fact.
Will Trump speak to Vladimir Putin in May? | No | 2026-05-31
b2cbf83f
Verifying…
Verify it yourself in your terminal
echo -n "Will Trump speak to Vladimir Putin in May? | No | 2026-05-31" | shasum -a 256 | cut -c1-8
🧑⚖️ AI judges
Low-friction event (single phone/video call suffices; one statement or media report resolves Yes). Consensus No priced at 87%+ with 3 days left triggers default reject per rules—no visible catalyst is irrelevant because any actor can trigger it instantly. No recent (30-90 day) behavior or incentives from Trump/Putin indicate a rushed May call; schedule focuses on other leaders with zero leaks or scheduling signals for Putin.
Market requires a qualifying verbal interaction (phone/video/in-person) strictly between May 1-31 2026 ET, confirmed by consensus credible media reporting (or unambiguous official statements not contradicted within 3 days). No such interaction has occurred or is scheduled/rumored in the final 3 days of May per all reporting; the only recent call was April 29 (pre-market). Strict timing + confirmation deadline + absence of any May event means unambiguous path to No resolution by June 3 at latest.
Price action shows Yes drifting sharply lower (-5pp 1d, -16pp 1w) on $41k volume with no recent news of a May call (only April calls reported), consistent with No at 87¢. Smart-money whales are split with tiny stakes and low 0.16 confidence leaning Yes, insufficient to override the clean microstructure and consensus hold. Thin remaining window and lack of flow against No support the thesis.
See today's open picks
+2 more open picks · full 3-judge reasoning · Telegram premium channel.
Subscribe Now