🔒 解决前已哈希封存
该预测在出 call 时已生成 SHA-256 哈希。任何人都可以验证 call 没有事后修改。
Will Steve Witkoff have a diplomatic meeting with Iran by May 31? | No | 2026-05-31
f989b01a
验证中…
在终端中自行验证
echo -n "Will Steve Witkoff have a diplomatic meeting with Iran by May 31? | No | 2026-05-31" | shasum -a 256 | cut -c1-8
🧑⚖️ AI 评审
Witkoff (Trump's special envoy) and Iranian officials (Araghchi et al.) have conducted only indirect/mediated talks via Qatar/Pakistan/Oman as of May 25; no announcements, travel plans, or incentives exist for Witkoff to fly for a qualifying in-person direct meeting in the remaining 6 days. Trump/Rubio statements emphasize ongoing indirect progress and caution on timing, with no demonstrated pattern or procedural path for a public, physical Witkoff-Iran negotiation before deadline. Base rate for such a specific high-friction direct diplomatic meeting in <1 week is near zero.
Rules require an in-person diplomatic meeting with Witkoff physically present and actively negotiating (direct or authorized indirect via mediators) by 11:59 PM ET May 31, publicly acknowledged or consensus-reported. All verifiable evidence shows only pre-market (pre-Apr 30) or current indirect mediator-only talks (Pakistan/Qatar/Doha as of May 25) with no Witkoff participation or imminent direct meeting announced. No qualifying event has occurred or is structurally guaranteed in the 6-day window, so market resolves No per explicit criteria and default-No on ambiguity.
Market at 91¢ No with $29k volume since Apr 30 shows real (if modest) liquidity and tight implied spread; Yes drifted -2pp 1d/-1pp 1w on the page, consistent with no direct Witkoff meeting materializing amid only indirect Qatar/Pakistan mediation. Zero whales on either side (neutral smart-money signal) and no opposing flow or stale-price warning; consensus >80% holds with no microstructure red flags.
查看今日所有开放推荐
再 +2 个开放推荐 · 完整 3 评审推理 · Telegram 高级频道。
立即订阅