该预测在出 call 时已生成 SHA-256 哈希。任何人都可以验证 call 没有事后修改。
Will Meta have the #3 AI model at the end of April 2026 (Style Control On)? | No | 2026-04-30
fe35e68a
验证中…
echo -n "Will Meta have the #3 AI model at the end of April 2026 (Style Control On)? | No | 2026-04-30" | shasum -a 256 | cut -c1-8The AI analyst's analysis is inaccurate as it only considers Llama models, ignoring Meta's muse-spark model currently ranked #5 on the relevant leaderboard (Text Arena Overall, Style Control On) with a preliminary score of 1496, just behind #3 at 1498. This proximity and recent release (April 9, 2026) make it plausible for Meta to reach #3 in the next 12 days, undermining the claimed low risk and 10% edge on buying No at 87¢. The true probability of No is likely around 80-85%, not 97% implied, failing the near-certain threshold given the volatility of preliminary rankings.
The web search confirms the analyst's finding. The current leaderboard ([lmarena.ai](https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard/text)) shows Meta's highest-ranked model (Meta · Llama 4) at rank 167 with a score of 1327, far outside the top 3, which are dominated by Anthropic and Google models. With only 12 days until resolution on April 30, 2026, it is extremely unlikely Meta will release a model that leapfrogs into the top 3. The 'No' side priced at 87% still offers a solid edge against a near-certain outcome.
Current Chatbot Arena data ([arena.ai](https://arena.ai/leaderboard/text), Apr 17, 2026) places Meta's highest-ranked model at #5, with the top 3 spots firmly occupied by Anthropic models. With only 12 days until the April 30 resolution deadline, it is highly improbable that Meta will release a new model or see existing scores surge enough to claim #3. Buying 'No' at 87% is a low-risk trade that comfortably exceeds the 80% probability threshold and offers strong short-term returns.
再 +2 个开放推荐 · 完整 3 评审推理 · Telegram 高级频道。
立即订阅