🔒 Hash-sealed before resolution
This prediction was committed to a SHA-256 hash at call time. Anyone can verify the call was not changed after the fact.
US x Iran permanent peace deal by June 7, 2026? | No | 2026-06-07
e6c32766
Verifying…
Verify it yourself in your terminal
echo -n "US x Iran permanent peace deal by June 7, 2026? | No | 2026-06-07" | shasum -a 256 | cut -c1-8
🧑⚖️ AI judges
Key actors (Trump, Pezeshkian, Khamenei/IRGC) show no incentive or recent pattern (last 30 days) toward a binding permanent peace deal; all movement is toward a temporary 60-day ceasefire extension/MOU pending approval, with core gaps (enrichment limits, verification) unresolved. Procedurally impossible in 6 days: requires signed treaty or definitive public confirmation of permanent end to hostilities, not rhetoric or tentative frameworks. Base rate near-zero; high-friction event with zero demonstrated commitment.
Rules require explicit permanent peace deal (written agreement or joint official confirmation of lasting end to hostilities) by 11:59 PM ET June 7; temporary extensions, negotiations, or MOUs explicitly excluded. Enrichment shows only tentative 60-day truce extensions and ongoing talks pending approval, with no qualifying permanent agreement or confirmation as of June 1. Smart-money NO lean (0.87) aligns; no resolver updates or evidence of imminent permanent deal in remaining 6 days.
No at 91¢ with $5.8M volume and recent Yes price drop (-3pp 1d, -22pp 1w) shows real consensus and flow against Yes; smart-money whales heavily concentrated on No ($923k stake, 0.87 confidence) with no opposing flow; latest reporting confirms only tentative 60-day ceasefire extension pending approval, not a qualifying permanent deal, so microstructure aligns with thesis and no arb gap or whale contradiction.
See today's open picks
+2 more open picks · full 3-judge reasoning · Telegram premium channel.
Subscribe Now