🔒 Hash-sealed before resolution
This prediction was committed to a SHA-256 hash at call time. Anyone can verify the call was not changed after the fact.
Will Trump speak to Volodymyr Zelenskyy in May? | No | 2026-05-31
315316f3
Verifying…
Verify it yourself in your terminal
echo -n "Will Trump speak to Volodymyr Zelenskyy in May? | No | 2026-05-31" | shasum -a 256 | cut -c1-8
🧑⚖️ AI judges
Trump's May 2026 schedule was dominated by the Beijing state visit with Xi and cabinet/Iran focus; no incentive, procedure, or recent behavior (last 30-90 days) points to any verbal contact with Zelenskyy. Base rate of unscheduled high-level calls in a narrow diplomatic window with zero public signals is near zero. Deadline has passed with no credible reporting or statements confirming a qualifying interaction, triggering the explicit 'resolves to No' clause if unconfirmed by the third calendar day after May 31.
Rules require consensus credible reporting (or qualifying statements) confirming a verbal interaction in May 2026 by end of June 3 ET; no such reports exist per searches, and UMA proposals are for No with disputes in final review. This is a consensus-priced No (98.5¢) with no plausible flip event before the hard confirmation cutoff. Smart-money lean on No aligns and is not contradicted by any evidence.
Price at 98.5¢ No with Yes dropping 41pp over the month and 10pp last week on $38k volume shows real flow toward No post-deadline with no credible talk reported. Smart money (0.80 confidence) heavily on No side via macrosteaks' $1.3k stake; Yes whales are tiny-stake noise. No order-book or sibling contradictions; microstructure fully consistent with Buy No at near-certainty after May 31 cutoff.
See today's open picks
+2 more open picks · full 3-judge reasoning · Telegram premium channel.
Subscribe Now