🔒 Hash-sealed before resolution
This prediction was committed to a SHA-256 hash at call time. Anyone can verify the call was not changed after the fact.
SCOTUS accepts sports event contract case by July 31, 2026? | No | 2025-07-31
8843e057
Verifying…
Verify it yourself in your terminal
echo -n "SCOTUS accepts sports event contract case by July 31, 2026? | No | 2025-07-31" | shasum -a 256 | cut -c1-8
🧑⚖️ AI judges
SCOTUS justices control the outcome and have shown zero recent movement toward granting cert on sports-event-contract preemption cases. Petitions (e.g., New Jersey) are not due until early July at earliest, Ninth Circuit decision still pending with no split materialized, and the Court is in summer recess with grants historically requiring weeks of conference review. Base rate for any cert grant is ~1% and timing constraints make a July 31 grant mechanically implausible; CFTC rulemaking further reduces urgency. High-friction procedural bar confirms consensus pricing of Yes at ~6% is accurate.
The market resolves Yes only upon an official SCOTUS certiorari grant (confirmed on the docket/orders list) in a qualifying sports-event-contract case by 11:59 PM ET July 31, 2026. No such grant has occurred; all reporting through late June 2026 discusses only pending or anticipated petitions (e.g., New Jersey after Third Circuit loss) and possible Ninth Circuit rulings that could create a split leading to later review. With ~33 days remaining and standard SCOTUS cert timelines, no plausible path exists for a qualifying grant before the deadline, so the rules unambiguously support No.
Market microstructure strongly supports the No side: $943K volume reflects real consensus, smart-money whales hold $1.38K on No (vs $28 on Yes) with 0.98 confidence, and price has been stable near 4-8% Yes with no aggressive flow against it. Thin remaining window to July 31 and absence of any docket activity keep the 97.9¢ No price aligned with tape and whale positioning; no red flags on liquidity or opposing smart money.
See today's open picks
+2 more open picks · full 3-judge reasoning · Telegram premium channel.
Subscribe Now