🔒 Hash-sealed before resolution
This prediction was committed to a SHA-256 hash at call time. Anyone can verify the call was not changed after the fact.
Kharg Island no longer under Iranian control by June 24? | No | 2026-06-24
df595edf
Verifying…
Verify it yourself in your terminal
echo -n "Kharg Island no longer under Iranian control by June 24? | No | 2026-06-24" | shasum -a 256 | cut -c1-8
🧑⚖️ AI judges
Key actors (Trump, IRGC, Iranian leadership) show clear recent pattern of rhetoric followed by immediate walkbacks, canceled strikes, and fragile ceasefire claims as of June 11-12; no ground forces deployed or control transferred despite months of threats. Seizing and holding Kharg requires high-friction multi-week military occupation that US has repeatedly shelved due to troop risks and energy disruption—impossible in the 11 days left. Base rates and incentives confirm Iran retains primary control; smart-money whales on No align with this behavioral reality.
Rules require actual establishment of foreign control (not strikes, threats, raids, or blockades), with contested/unclear status defaulting to No. All reporting shows only rhetoric, past military strikes on defenses (oil facilities untouched), and recent cancellations/ceasefire talks; Iran retains operational control with loading ongoing. No plausible flip-event exists before the June 24 deadline, making this a consensus No trade with P(win) >>90%.
Smart money heavily aligned on No (7 profitable whales, $27k stake vs $3 on Yes, confidence 1.00). Volume $152k is meaningful with Yes price drifting lower (-0.9pp 1d) on recent walk-backs/ceasefire news, consistent with thesis of no actual control change by deadline. Consensus hold at 97.6% with no whale opposition or thin-book signals.
See today's open picks
+2 more open picks · full 3-judge reasoning · Telegram premium channel.
Subscribe Now