This prediction was committed to a SHA-256 hash at call time. Anyone can verify the call was not changed after the fact.
Will Baltazar Fedalizo advance from the CA-37 primary election? | Yes | 2026-07-10
b884fd3b
Verifying…
echo -n "Will Baltazar Fedalizo advance from the CA-37 primary election? | Yes | 2026-07-10" | shasum -a 256 | cut -c1-8Primary occurred June 2 (post-market open); multiple official/media sources (CA SOS, NBC, NYT, Daily News, Ballotpedia) confirm Fedalizo in clear 2nd place (~13%) and thus advances under top-two rules. No remaining procedural or behavioral barriers; outcome is factual and locked in. P(Yes) ≈ 100%.
Rules resolve Yes if Fedalizo is one of the top two vote-getters in the June 2 primary per consensus of official sources (explicitly including sos.ca.gov); unofficial SOS results and multiple major outlets (NBC, NYT, Daily News, Ballotpedia) confirm Kamlager-Dove ~52% and Fedalizo ~13.2% as clear #1/#2, satisfying top-two advancement with no attribution or exclusion issues. Certification deadline of July 10 provides structural guarantee of final confirmation within the window; no resolver updates override, and this is the consensus-priced outcome with no plausible rule-based flip.
Post-primary results (June 2) show Fedalizo clearly in 2nd place (~13%) per SOS, NBC, Daily News, and Ballotpedia with Kamlager-Dove at ~52%; top-two advance under CA rules. Yes price at 95¢ with +28pp 1w drift on rising volume, tight smart-money alignment (profitable Yes whale), and no opposing flow or thin-book issues. Low total volume is consistent with near-certain consensus hold after the event.
Category: Mispricing
{'cause_category': 'news_event_post_call', 'explanation': 'Early June 2 partial results (Fedalizo ~13.2%, Mota ~10.3%) led judges to assume top-two lock-in, but subsequent vote updates (mail/remaining precincts) flipped it: final certified results showed Kamlager-Dove 55.2%, Mota 11.7%, Fedalizo 10.7% (SOS/Ballotpedia/NYT/NBC as of late June/July). Market resolved No on July 10 certification.', 'references': ['https://dp.electionresults.sos.ca.gov/returns/us-rep/district/37', 'https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2026-primary-elections/california-us-house-district-37-results', 'https://ballotpedia.org/California%27s_37th_Congressional_District_election,_2026'], 'key_lesson': 'Never bet on early primary results—wait for full mail/absentee tallies or certification before high-confidence calls.', 'judge_model': 'x-ai/grok-4.3'}
+2 more open picks · full 3-judge reasoning · Telegram premium channel.
Subscribe Now