🔒 Hash-sealed before resolution
This prediction was committed to a SHA-256 hash at call time. Anyone can verify the call was not changed after the fact.
Will Trump agree to Iranian transit fees in the Strait of Hormuz by June 30? | No | 2026-06-30
645c65de
Verifying…
Verify it yourself in your terminal
echo -n "Will Trump agree to Iranian transit fees in the Strait of Hormuz by June 30? | No | 2026-06-30" | shasum -a 256 | cut -c1-8
🧑⚖️ AI judges
Key actors (Trump + US envoys) have explicitly rejected Iranian toll demands and continue pushing for unrestricted Hormuz access without fees; stalled negotiations show zero movement toward acceptance in the remaining 23 days. High-friction requirement (definitive public announcement or formal treaty) cannot be met on this timeline given Trump's incentives and recent rhetoric. Base rate of US conceding Hormuz tolls to Iran under Trump is near-zero; smart-money whales correctly price this at ~97% No.
Rules require explicit definitive US announcement or formal treaty/deal accepting Iranian fees; only suggestions/negotiations explicitly excluded. Enrichment and searches confirm stalled talks with Trump repeatedly rejecting tolls and demanding free passage, no qualifying agreement by June 7. Consensus No at 96.8% with no plausible rule-based flip in 23 days; smart-money NO lean consistent.
Smart money strongly aligned with No (0.97 confidence, $67k vs $958 on Yes from profitable whales). Volume $164k is meaningful for a short-dated market; 1w price action shows only minor drift (-5pp) with no aggressive flow against the 96.8% consensus. No thin-book signals or contradicting sibling-bin movement; microstructure supports riding the near-certain No to resolution.
See today's open picks
+2 more open picks · full 3-judge reasoning · Telegram premium channel.
Subscribe Now