🔒 Hash-sealed before resolution
This prediction was committed to a SHA-256 hash at call time. Anyone can verify the call was not changed after the fact.
US x Iran permanent peace deal by June 30, 2026? | No | 2026-06-30
fcb5cce3
Verifying…
Verify it yourself in your terminal
echo -n "US x Iran permanent peace deal by June 30, 2026? | No | 2026-06-30" | shasum -a 256 | cut -c1-8
🧑⚖️ AI judges
Key actors (Trump, Khamenei, IRGC, Iranian FM) show no aligned incentive or recent action toward a signed permanent peace deal; instead, June 2026 saw fresh US strikes, Iranian rejections of proposals, Strait closures, and explicit statements of stalled/no-serious-will talks. High-friction requirement (written agreement + mutual confirmation) cannot be met in 19 days given procedural realities and base-rate zero precedents. Rhetoric of 'days away' is classic Trump bombast without concrete movement, confirming No at 85¢.
Rules require explicit permanent (not temporary) peace deal via signed agreement or joint official confirmation; enrichment shows only stalled talks, sanctions, strikes, and temporary ceasefire extensions through early June 2026 with no qualifying event. Deadline is June 30 with <3 weeks left and no plausible path to the required formal instrument. Analyst's No side aligns with strict criteria and default-No on ambiguity; smart-money lean to No reinforces without contradiction.
Market prices No at 85% with $22M+ volume and sharp downward drift in Yes (-23pp 1m, -10pp 1w) amid ongoing hostilities and stalled permanent-deal talks; smart-money whales heavily concentrated on No ($402k stake vs $75k on Yes, 0.72 confidence) with no opposing flow. Order-book liquidity and price action fully consistent with consensus No hold; no thin-book or staleness signals. Below-50% rule does not apply as recommended side is 85%.
📝 Post-mortem
Category: Mispricing
{'cause_category': 'news_event_post_call', 'explanation': "Breakthrough MOU (Islamabad Memorandum) signed June 17, 2026 (announced ~June 11-14) explicitly stated 'immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts' and was treated by Polymarket rules as qualifying permanent peace deal (any agreement signaling lasting end to hostilities). Judges at call (June 11) cited only stalled talks/strikes with no path in <3 weeks; rapid Qatar/Pakistan-mediated deal post-call flipped it.", 'references': ['https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Iran_war_ceasefire', 'https://polymarketanalytics.com/event/us-x-iran-permanent-peace-deal-by', 'https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/14/us-iran-war-peace-deal.html'], 'key_lesson': "Monitor real-time diplomatic announcements and exact resolution language for interim MOUs that use 'permanent' phrasing.", 'judge_model': 'x-ai/grok-4.3'}
See today's open picks
+2 more open picks · full 3-judge reasoning · Telegram premium channel.
Subscribe Now