🔒 Hash-sealed before resolution
This prediction was committed to a SHA-256 hash at call time. Anyone can verify the call was not changed after the fact.
Jones Act domestic shipping requirements removed by June 30? | No | 2026-06-30
181044b8
Verifying…
Verify it yourself in your terminal
echo -n "Jones Act domestic shipping requirements removed by June 30? | No | 2026-06-30" | shasum -a 256 | cut -c1-8
🧑⚖️ AI judges
Key actors (Congress, maritime unions, shipbuilders, Trump admin) have zero incentive and strong revealed opposition to permanent Jones Act removal; only temporary national-defense waivers issued, explicitly preserving the statute with no bills introduced or advanced. High-friction procedural barriers (legislation or binding EO) cannot complete in the remaining ~3 weeks. Base rate of meaningful Jones Act reform in any short window is near zero; recent behavior (waiver extensions opposed, status-quo reinforcement) confirms No outcome.
Rules require permanent repeal/alteration/invalidation or new binding legislation/EO removing at least one Jones Act requirement (build/own/flag/crew) by 11:59 PM ET June 30, 2026; temporary waivers (60+90 days, through mid-August) explicitly preserve the statute and do not qualify. No bills, riders, or permanent EOs exist or are plausible in the 23-day window per official sources and credible reporting. Analyst's Buy No side aligns with unambiguous rules and evidence; consensus No (>98%) has no rule-based flip path.
Market at 98.1% No with $52k volume, tight implied consensus, and 1w price drift of only -1.6pp shows no aggressive flow against the side. Smart-money whales are heavily concentrated on No ($1,447 stake vs $8 on Yes, 0.99 confidence), consistent with real alignment rather than proxies. No thin-book red flags or sibling contradictions; microstructure fully supports riding the consensus hold to resolution.
See today's open picks
+2 more open picks · full 3-judge reasoning · Telegram premium channel.
Subscribe Now