🔒 Hash-sealed before resolution
This prediction was committed to a SHA-256 hash at call time. Anyone can verify the call was not changed after the fact.
Les Wexner charged by June 30? | No | 2026-06-30
cd5fcbb7
Verifying…
Verify it yourself in your terminal
echo -n "Les Wexner charged by June 30? | No | 2026-06-30" | shasum -a 256 | cut -c1-8
🧑⚖️ AI judges
Key actors (DOJ prosecutors, state AGs) show zero recent momentum or incentive for indictment; Feb 2026 deposition and civil suits produced no grand jury signals or charging timeline, and DOJ previously cleared him as non-target. High-friction process (investigation → grand jury → formal indictment) cannot complete in 27 days absent prior groundwork. Base rate of sudden charges against connected figures like Wexner is near-zero; recent behavior (no subpoenas/announcements) points away from Yes.
Rules require formal US federal/state criminal charges or indictment of Wexner by 11:59 PM ET June 30, 2026 (market opened Feb 20). Primary evidence is official gov sources or wide credible consensus; none exists as of June 3. All reporting confirms no charges despite Feb 2026 deposition and prior FBI docs; civil suits do not qualify. 27-day window + zero signals of grand jury/charging activity makes Yes impossible under literal rules; No is the unambiguous outcome with no flip risk.
No at 95.9¢ with $10.5K volume, tight implied spread, and 1w price drift of only -2.1pp shows real (if modest) liquidity supporting consensus; smart-money whales are heavily aligned on No ($1.4K stake vs $3 on Yes) with no opposing flow. Recent news (board absence, civil suits) confirms zero charging signals in the final 27 days, consistent with near-certain No resolution and no stale-price or thin-book red flags.
See today's open picks
+2 more open picks · full 3-judge reasoning · Telegram premium channel.
Subscribe Now