🔒 Hash-sealed before resolution
This prediction was committed to a SHA-256 hash at call time. Anyone can verify the call was not changed after the fact.
State of Siege declared in Chile by June 30? | No | 2026-06-30
d00f3a5c
Verifying…
Verify it yourself in your terminal
echo -n "State of Siege declared in Chile by June 30? | No | 2026-06-30" | shasum -a 256 | cut -c1-8
🧑⚖️ AI judges
This is a low-friction consensus No trade priced at 97.5% with ~1 month left: the President alone can submit an Estado de Sitio decree at any moment (triggering the 5-day congressional window), and no procedural barrier prevents it. Kast's incentives and recent actions favor targeted operations over the most restrictive exception, but one sudden statement or decree suffices to flip the outcome. Base rate of such declarations is near-zero absent acute nationwide crisis, yet the low-friction rule requires rejecting consensus No holds until the deadline passes without the trigger.
Rules require explicit 'Estado de Sitio' decree per Art. 40 (published in Diario Oficial, survives 5-day Congress window); States of Emergency/Catastrophe explicitly excluded. No such decree has occurred since market open (Dec 2025) per Diario Oficial searches and credible reporting; Kast's 'emergency government' rhetoric does not qualify. With ~1 month left and no acute crisis or momentum, no plausible rule-based path to Yes exists—consensus No at 97.5% is safe.
Consensus hold at 97.5¢ No with $57K volume, tight implied spread, and 1w/1m price action stable (no drift against). Smart money strongly aligned on No (top whale scottilicious with $1.5K stake, 0.94 confidence); no opposing profitable whales or thin-book signals. No recent news or sibling-bin moves contradict the locked-in low probability of an explicit Estado de Sitio decree before deadline.
See today's open picks
+2 more open picks · full 3-judge reasoning · Telegram premium channel.
Subscribe Now